5 log virus reduction at high loading (up to 20 kg/L), while DVD and Bispecific 2 showed strong retention (>4 LRV) at lower capacities. Superior Performance vs Competitor – Sartobind® Q membranes consistently outperformed competitor membranes in virus retention across all molecules, even at higher load capacities.">

Thank you - Your Download is Available Below

Comprehensive Virus Clearance Evaluation of the Sartobind® Q Membrane

PDF | 737.2 KB

Download

Comprehensive Virus Clearance Evaluation of the Sartobind® Q Membrane

This study evaluates the virus clearance potential of the Sartobind® Q membrane adsorber in the purification process of four biologics (mAb, DVD, Bispecific 1, and Bispecific 2). Virus clearance is a critical regulatory requirement; with murine minute virus (MMV) used as a model "worst-case" virus. The work investigates scalability (Pico vs Nano devices), maximum loading capacities, and compares Sartobind® Q with competitor membranes.

 

Key Takeaways:

  1. Scalability and Device Equivalence – Sartobind® Q Nano (1 mL) and Pico (0.08 mL) devices showed comparable virus clearance, validating Pico’s use in studies with limited material.
  2. High Virus Retention – Two molecules (mAb, Bispecific 1) maintained >5 log virus reduction at high loading (up to 20 kg/L), while DVD and Bispecific 2 showed strong retention (>4 LRV) at lower capacities.
  3. Superior Performance vs Competitor – Sartobind® Q membranes consistently outperformed competitor membranes in virus retention across all molecules, even at higher load capacities.

Please Complete the Form

Complete Form to Access the File

icon-shopping-cart
Ready to Buy?